Review



anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction  (Partek)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Partek anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction
    Microarray analysis of microglial gene expression in HC, CSD-S, and CSD-R mice shows a major effect in susceptible microglia. ( a ) Heat map results from unsupervised clustering for all differentially expressed genes reveals treatment grouping (One-way ANOVA; <t>false</t> <t>discovery</t> <t>rate</t> <t>(FDR)</t> q < 0.05). ( b ) Comparison of up- and down-regulated genes with ≥1.5x change in gene expression in the two defeated groups compared to HC.
    Anova With False Discovery Rate (Fdr) Correction, supplied by Partek, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction/product/Partek
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Decoding microglia responses to psychosocial stress reveals blood-brain barrier breakdown that may drive stress susceptibility"

    Article Title: Decoding microglia responses to psychosocial stress reveals blood-brain barrier breakdown that may drive stress susceptibility

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28737-8

    Microarray analysis of microglial gene expression in HC, CSD-S, and CSD-R mice shows a major effect in susceptible microglia. ( a ) Heat map results from unsupervised clustering for all differentially expressed genes reveals treatment grouping (One-way ANOVA; false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05). ( b ) Comparison of up- and down-regulated genes with ≥1.5x change in gene expression in the two defeated groups compared to HC.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Microarray analysis of microglial gene expression in HC, CSD-S, and CSD-R mice shows a major effect in susceptible microglia. ( a ) Heat map results from unsupervised clustering for all differentially expressed genes reveals treatment grouping (One-way ANOVA; false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05). ( b ) Comparison of up- and down-regulated genes with ≥1.5x change in gene expression in the two defeated groups compared to HC.

    Techniques Used: Microarray, Gene Expression, Comparison



    Similar Products

    anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction  (Partek)
    90
    Partek anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction
    Microarray analysis of microglial gene expression in HC, CSD-S, and CSD-R mice shows a major effect in susceptible microglia. ( a ) Heat map results from unsupervised clustering for all differentially expressed genes reveals treatment grouping (One-way ANOVA; <t>false</t> <t>discovery</t> <t>rate</t> <t>(FDR)</t> q < 0.05). ( b ) Comparison of up- and down-regulated genes with ≥1.5x change in gene expression in the two defeated groups compared to HC.
    Anova With False Discovery Rate (Fdr) Correction, supplied by Partek, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction/product/Partek
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anova with false discovery rate (fdr) correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    one-way anova with correction for type i error using false-discovery rate (fdr) adjustment  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute one-way anova with correction for type i error using false-discovery rate (fdr) adjustment
    Microarray analysis of microglial gene expression in HC, CSD-S, and CSD-R mice shows a major effect in susceptible microglia. ( a ) Heat map results from unsupervised clustering for all differentially expressed genes reveals treatment grouping (One-way ANOVA; <t>false</t> <t>discovery</t> <t>rate</t> <t>(FDR)</t> q < 0.05). ( b ) Comparison of up- and down-regulated genes with ≥1.5x change in gene expression in the two defeated groups compared to HC.
    One Way Anova With Correction For Type I Error Using False Discovery Rate (Fdr) Adjustment, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/one-way anova with correction for type i error using false-discovery rate (fdr) adjustment/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    one-way anova with correction for type i error using false-discovery rate (fdr) adjustment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Microarray analysis of microglial gene expression in HC, CSD-S, and CSD-R mice shows a major effect in susceptible microglia. ( a ) Heat map results from unsupervised clustering for all differentially expressed genes reveals treatment grouping (One-way ANOVA; false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05). ( b ) Comparison of up- and down-regulated genes with ≥1.5x change in gene expression in the two defeated groups compared to HC.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Decoding microglia responses to psychosocial stress reveals blood-brain barrier breakdown that may drive stress susceptibility

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28737-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Microarray analysis of microglial gene expression in HC, CSD-S, and CSD-R mice shows a major effect in susceptible microglia. ( a ) Heat map results from unsupervised clustering for all differentially expressed genes reveals treatment grouping (One-way ANOVA; false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05). ( b ) Comparison of up- and down-regulated genes with ≥1.5x change in gene expression in the two defeated groups compared to HC.

    Article Snippet: Normalized data sets were compared in Partek by ANOVA with false discovery rate (FDR) correction ( q < 0.05) to assess differential transcript expression across behavioral phenotypes.

    Techniques: Microarray, Gene Expression, Comparison